Court awards N55m damages to ex-Unical students for unaccredited engineering courses
The Federal High Court, Calabar Division, has ordered the University of Calabar to pay N55 million to eight ex-students admitted into the institution’s engineering programmes in 2021, which lacked accreditation.
In a judgment delivered by Justice Rosemary Dugbo-Oghoghorie, the court described the university’s conduct as fraudulent, reckless, and deceitful.
Supreme news reports that the judgment brought to an end a five-year legal dispute filed with suit number FHC/CA/CS/117/21.
The case was instituted in 2021 by Idiong Godwin and seven other students, referred to as the “Unical 8”.
Defendants in the suit are: the University of Calabar, its former Vice Chancellor, Prof. Florence Obi, and four others.
The students approached the court after discovering that the engineering programmes, into which they had been admitted, lacked accreditation by the National Universities Commission (NUC) and the Council for the Regulation of Engineering in Nigeria (COREN).
According to the plaintiffs, the university presented the programmes as fully operational in its faculty handbooks and public representations.
The plaintiffs said that it was only after they had progressed to their third and fourth year, paid their fees, and completed examinations that the NUC, during a resource verification exercise, directed them to revert to 200 level because the courses were not accredited.
According to the students, some departments were later discontinued entirely, leaving those affected stranded academically.
In its defence, the university argued that accreditation follows a process and claimed the students were aware of the circumstances when they enrolled.
The institution also maintained that the students acted of their own choice.
However, Justice Dugbo-Oghoghorie rejected that argument and held that the university failed in its duty of care.
The court ruled that no institution should run an academic programme without prior approval from the NUC and that students ought to have been properly informed of the accreditation status before admission.
The judge further held that full accreditation for the programmes was only obtained in the 2024/2025 academic session, long after the affected students were expected to graduate.
Consequently, the court awarded N50 million in general damages and N5.2 million in special damages, citing the psychological distress and academic setback suffered by the plaintiffs.
The motion to halt programmes in the Faculty of Engineering was refused, as evidence before the court showed that accreditation has now been secured.
Also, the prayer to return the students to their former departments was also declined on the grounds that events had overtaken the request, particularly with the discontinuation of some departments.
Reacting to the judgment, counsel to the students, Mr Ozinko Ozinko, praised his clients for challenging the institution, noting that although the compensation offers some relief, it cannot fully restore the years lost.
One of the plaintiffs, Ekpedeme Godwin, expressed satisfaction with the outcome, saying the students endured significant hardship and intimidation before seeking redress in court.
On his part, counsel to the university, Mr Jonas Abuo, expressed appreciation to the court but declined to comment further.